tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-970746810324898604.post177159446328496214..comments2023-03-22T07:01:56.428+01:00Comments on Lost On Time: Ever get the feeling you've been cheated - wrong in fact, wrong in theory?ejhhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01582272075999298935noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-970746810324898604.post-46358948227652229722020-07-24T21:36:25.508+02:002020-07-24T21:36:25.508+02:00I suppose this is an urban legend.
1. Nf3 surely w...I suppose this is an urban legend.<br />1. Nf3 surely was not a "blunder" but a "book move", also at chess.com. (Btw, also the category "perfect" does not exist there, but I would not stick to that wording ..).<br />Maybe you can ask your "friend" for a screenshot of the analysis, then I would believe it ...Ammerbuchernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-970746810324898604.post-56906938572564532342019-11-15T18:06:49.805+01:002019-11-15T18:06:49.805+01:00*Perfect*, not "pefect", of course.*Perfect*, not "pefect", of course. Avital Pilpelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01442857394706283315noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-970746810324898604.post-29978488073234739192019-11-15T18:05:48.516+01:002019-11-15T18:05:48.516+01:00A friend of mine, a master, just won a blitz game ...A friend of mine, a master, just won a blitz game on chess.com with "98% accuracy". As he showed me, the only "blunder" chess.com thinks he made was the horrible move 1.Nf3 ... everything else was "pefect". The chess.com accuracy algorithm is nonsense. Avital Pilpelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01442857394706283315noreply@blogger.com